12th December 2011

Ten Reasons to be optimistic about G.I. Joe: Retaliation

I’m sure eventually you guys will tire of my constant posts about G.I. Joe: Retaliation, but let’s face it, with the film coming out next June, there’s going to be a lot to talk about over the next six months.  As always, you can expect me to be on top of everything as it happens.

The rocket shots of social media updates, interaction with the production team, and hushed whispers about what might be on the horizon have gotten me pretty amped up.

But, I figure if I’m going to be all giddy and excitable over the next half-year, I might as well provide some reasons why, especially considering the lackluster response that the first film generated.  I’ve seen a lot of questions out there asking exactly why folks should be pumped up for this movie, based on the first.  Well, let me give you ten reasons, at least as I see them.

Click the “Read the Rest of the Story” link below for the full story!

10 – Jon Chu

I was right there with you when I first heard the news.  Jon Chu?  The musical director?  Justin Bieber?  I will admit, my initial reaction was fear that perhaps Paramount wasn’t taking the sequel seriously.

Well, those fears were eliminated fairly quickly.  While it will be impossible to tell just what Jon Chu’s impact is until June 29, 2012, judging by his enthusiasm, his interaction with the fandom, and the reactions of several of his cast and crew, this is a guy who has the respect and dedication of several of his professional peers.  Let’s not forget he’s also won critical acclaim and awards for his production of Justin Bieber’s Never Say Never, and regardless what the source material is, being an award-winning director is nothing to scoff at.

He so clearly loves working on the Joe film as well, and I know I put a hell of a lot more effort into a job when I’m thoroughly enjoying it.  Something tells me that rings true here as well.  I was a skeptic, but I’ve come around in a big way.

Not to mention, as GeneralsJoes reader DistantFred reminds me, dance choreography and action film choreography can both work very nicely in conjunction with each other.  Also, in my opinion, music is an integral part of a successful action film, and I have no doubts that Mr. Chu can bring both of these skills to the table.

9 – A fresh start

Yes, we all know that G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra was not an amazing feat of film making prowess.  While there were certain parts that I still enjoy about it, there is no doubt that it left a very bad taste in many folks’ mouths.  Well, by many indications, G.I. Joe: Retaliation is trying to leave the aura of the first film in its dust.

Rachel Nichols Tweeted famously earlier this year that she was not being invited back as Scarlett.  Marlon Wayans expressed displeasure that he was not invited back as Ripcord (even letting fly a potential spoiler about Ripcord’s fate in the process).  We also know that Dennis Quaid is not returning, nor is Adewale Akinnouye-Agbaje, and Joseph Gordon-Leavitt unceremoniously dismissed the thought as well.  Sienna Miller is also noticeable by her absence, and she didn’t apparently have any love lost for the production of the original film as it is.

While Channing Tatum is returning to his role as Duke, it’s unknown how much of a focus he will be, and in fact his short filming shift and lack of promotion for the film has led me to believe he may not have much more than a cameo appearance in the film itself.

So, judging by the few things that we know (Zartan is the President, Duke and Snake Eyes have returned) this film is obviously a continuation of the first by strict standards, but the production team is making every effort to separate this one from the original.  I think that is a brilliant move.  By pulling away from the whole Duke/Baroness/Cobra Commander triangle I think you leave the worst part of the first film as a bad dream and move on to focus on the cutting edge military action that is the core of the property.

You can produce this film as a second film, and yet push the cast and the basic premise of the first film to the background, and end up with a great follow up that hopefully isn’t bogged down by the memories of the first.  I can’t think of a better way to do it.

8 – Refined source material

A production began for The Rise of Cobra, G.I. Joe was sort of in flux.  With the Devils’ Due comic and the Sigma 6 line the two most visible tie-ins to the universe, the film producers had some mixed signals.  It was apparently due to some Devils’ Due reference material that led the costume designers to give Snake Eyes his infamous lips, and the Reactive Armor battle suits were no doubt inspired by Sigma 6, the predominant toyline at the time the reference material was provided.  This combination left a fairly bad taste in many fan’s mouths, since they felt that did not accurately represent the spirit of the brand, and I cannot argue.

This most recent film comes on the heels of an extremely successful 25th Anniversary rebranding, and the state of the art Pursuit of Cobra toyline, which took modern military aesthetics to the limit, blending technology and the armed forces perfectly.  Judging by what we’ve seen in footage and screen shots so far, that energy and mentality has been carried over into the film, and it serves G.I. Joe perfectly.

7 – No Stephen Sommers

Unlike Jon Chu, Sommers had a long and established history as an action film director, but that’s not always a good thing.  Sommers was well known for his high-energy, effects laden popcorn films like the Mummy, Van Helsing, and other related properties, which were no doubt eye candy, but lacked a lot of substance and spirit.  Thus it came as no surprise that the Rise of Cobra fell for many of the same pratfalls.

Not only that, but some aspects of character were sacrificed so Sommers could work in a cameo by Brandon Fraser for no other reason than to say he did.  One of the most loathed aspects of the first film, the Accelerator Suits, were also shoe-horned into the picture by a pre-established scene that Sommers had always wanted to include in a movie, but just hadn’t had the right opportunity.  They were not even written for the G.I. Joe concept.  I think Stephen Sommers is proof that it’s not always about pedigree, and I think Chu “gets it” 100% more than Sommers ever did.  Certainly doesn’t hurt that to Jon Chu it at least appears to be more than just a paycheck.  I don’t believe you can say the same thing about Sommers.

6 – Social Media

Without a doubt, Social Media has played a huge role in the promotion of this second film, and I’m thrilled for it.  The excitement of seeing the constant stream of Tweets from Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, and getting the unique opportunity to interact directly with Jon Chu, the director of the film, has made this whole pre-production process very exciting.  Not only that, but it creates a level of investment by the fandom, as we get a chance to be a part of the process.  Chu, The Rock, and Ray Park’s almost constant every-day activity throughout various forms of social media has created an environment of fun interactivity, and shared the joy they all seemed to have working together.

5 – Cobra has been established

As the title indicated, the first film was essentially about the Rise or proliferation of Cobra.  With MARS as the focal point, Cobra ended up somewhat in the background, and most of the fan favorite aspects of the Real American Hero ended up in the ether.  In the second film, it would seem that Cobra is now an established group and Joe fans can relish a more face-front version of the evil terrorist organization that we all love.

MARS is good and all, but give me some good old fashioned Cobra troopers and Cobra hardware.  I think we’ll see much of that in Retaliation.

4 – More military aesthetic

Another complaint many fans had of the original film was that narrow line between military and science fiction ended up blurred and there was way too much science fiction and not enough military.  Accelerator Suits, Nanomites and Neo-Vipers all gave the impression that a much more sci-fi heavy universe was at play here.  From what we’ve seen so far from Retaliation, there is a lot more military and a lot less sci-fi here.  The plethora of real world weaponry that The Rock has shown off, the obvious military angle in the trailer and screen shots just goes to prove that this sequel is much less thrust into the “10 minutes in the future” concept and much more real world.  Obviously with the cool Snake Eyes armor and Roadblock’s flak vest, there are some more futuristic aspects here, but most of what we’ve seen has been purely straight-laced military.

3 – Learning from past mistakes

Going along with the idea that the sequel is separating itself from the previous film, I do think the team here has also learned from past mistakes.  While I’m certain they won’t say it publicly, it’s been perfectly obvious that there are aspects of The Rise of Cobra that the producers have not been happy with and they are continuing to distance themselves from it.

Most of what I’ve mentioned here the production team understands as well, and while Rise of Cobra made enough money to earn the right to a sequel, I know they have learned from them and are finding ways to fix what was “broken”.  The evolved cast, the more military story, and various updates from members of the cast and crew have only cemented that fact.

2 – The Rock

Need I say more?  One of Pro Wrestling’s most charismatic superstars, Dwayne Johnson has done what few wrestlers have been able to do, and transcended from Wrestling to a full blown acting career.  The end result is someone who pulls from many different audiences and has built a legion of fans worldwide who follow him religiously.  With a Facebook page with millions of “Likes” and a Twitter feed with hundreds of thousands of followers, The Rock brings a built-in audience to the G.I. Joe film, something that will hopefully generate many more box office returns next June.

Add to that the fact that Dwayne Johnson is an established action star with an impressive arsenal of action movies already and he brings some great stuff to the table.  Quite the departure from Channing Tatum in the 2009 film.

1 – No writer’s strike

While there were many reasons to point fingers at the first film, most of the blame can fall upon the writer’s strike.  Leading up to the film, a famous writer’s strike put a severe limit on the utilization of Hollywood writers throughout the film industry, and in fact many of those involved in the Rise of Cobra said they were still writing the film as filming was going on.

This environment is not conducive to successful film making, and the end result was a clear indication of that.  Whatever the issues were with the original film, the most glaring ones can be tied back to a lack of consistent script-writing, which impacted every other step of the production process.  Without the foundation of a good script, almost every element of a film suffers, and I feel very comfortable that the sequel will not fall into that trap.

Using the skillful duo of Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, two successful writers who also have a strong attachment to the property, Paramount has immediately raised the bar well above and beyond what we got with the initial film release.

I’m not one of those G.I. Joe fans who tears apart every element of the original Rise of Cobra film.  There were aspects of it that I really enjoyed.  That being said, I cannot argue that there were plenty of areas of improvement, and from everything I’ve seen so far, G.I. Joe: Retaliation covers every single base.  It would seem as if they are doing everything right, and I for one could not be happier.

Bring on June, 2012!

Related posts:

  1. G.I. Joe: Retaliation Trailer should be released “imminently”
  2. Do you want to see the trailer for G.I. Joe: Retaliation? Make your voice heard!
  3. G.I. Joe: Retaliation title confirmed via Twitter?
  4. G.I. Joe: Retaliation influenced by “The Rock’s” positive impact
  5. G.I. Joe: Retaliation reportedly will have a PG-13 Rating
This entry was posted on Monday, December 12th, 2011 at 8:18 am and is filed under G.I. Joe, G.I. Joe 2, G.I. Joe 2: Retaliation, G.I. Joe: The Movie. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  • Hawkwinter

    Very well said Justin.

  • JMM

    I agree with you enough here to be cautiously optimistic about this new movie. And I’m one of the big Joe fans who didn’t like the previous one. I think the original movie did OK as far as box office goes, but I’m pleased to see that the producers still realized that they had not really succeeded as much as the could have. I tend to think the Transformers movies’ huge success was more of what they were hoping for.

    I do think its too bad that we won’t see Scarlett or the Baroness in this one. They seem like such key aspects of G.I. Joe, I’d like to see them again. Miller seems to not have been thrilled with the original, so that’s no surprise, but was Nichols simply not asked back. She wasn’t a bright spot in the flick, but I blame that on the character being poorly written. And the Baroness was one of the real entertaining parts of the last one, I think. Too bad they ruined that fun villain by having her turn out to be brainwashed, or whatever.

    But one thing really making me optimistic is, yes, The Rock. The guy just seems so enthusiastic about this flick, I think he’ll bring something good to the movie, and he should play a big part in marketing this film. I bet they’ll book him on as many talk shows as they can!

  • Scott

    6 months will fly by, and the older I get the faster it will get.

    So, by my math, the next 3 months will go by slower than the 3 months after that.

  • FeloniousMonk

    It’s a popcorn movie, just like the first one; if it entertains, it’s done its job. I still don’t understand the hate towards the first flick. What did geeks expect, “Casablanca”?

    From all accounts, “Retaliation” will be right up most geek’s alley: full of pop-culture cliches, comic/anime memes and other such hackneyed themes geeks go gaga for. Nothing wrong with that, it means Chu figured out his audience. Somers was hamstrung by rushed material, a rushed schedule and a fanbase full of whiny, know-it-all ingrates who were down on it before it even began. He also miscalculated, believing Joe fans were closer to being James Bond fans than they were to being Pro Wrastlin’ and/or anime fans.

  • Rapierduel

    its not GI Joe till Shipwreck is in it.

  • http://www.compulsivecollector.com/ Compulsive Collector

    To be fair, I think Stephen Sommers was having a blast when he was making the first movie. He was full of energy and enthusiasm, too. I didn’t see it as “just a check” for him. Rushing the movie into production definitely had a negative impact, but I think sticking with the Duke/Rex buddy story plot from the old script was the biggest mistake they made. They should have scrapped everything Gordon, Elliot, Lovett, and Woods had written and started from scratch. Having said all that, I enjoyed the flick for what it was. I’m cautiously optimistic for the sequel, but good toys are all I really need to be happy with it.

  • http://twitter.com/geoffdes78 Geoff DeSouza

    Standards have jumped in recent years. Between Nolan’s Batman movies and pretty much all of Marvel’s stuff, plus geeky franchises with a longer history of putting forth good efforts on screen like Star Trek recently having well-recieved efforts, saying “it’s just a popcorn flick” isn’t really a relevant excuse.

    I don’t expect – or want – Full Metal Jacket with some guys wearing the Cobra logo as the antagonists, but at least (a) try and understand what the appeal was of the source material in the first place and (b) if you have to change something, change it for a good reason.

    Otherwise, you have bad end products like the first movie and the Transformers movies.

  • http://twitter.com/geoffdes78 Geoff DeSouza

    Well said. While The Rock is by no means a guarantee of a great movie – or even a good one – he at least brings a screen presence to the Joe side that the team lacked last time around.

    That said, it would’ve been nice to get Quaid and Nichols back. It wouldn’t stun me at all if they re-cast CC and the Baronness in cameos.

  • poddie

    I agree with Justin, the new movie is looking very good so far.

    I mostly have concerns about how they will resolve/explain the major mess of plot that the first film left. If there are more sequels, it sure would be a shame if they couldn’t use characters like Scarlet, Baroness, and Cobra Commander just because the script of the first one decided to paint them all into a bad corner. Really stinks that they made those choices…

    I will especially miss Rachel Nichols… I though she made a spectacular Scarlet. I don’t understand why they didn’t bring her back… they could have easily cut the tie to Rip Cord (thank goodness he’s not returning, that was just a disaster).

  • FeloniousMonk

    Nope, popcorn flick still. Nolan’s Batman movies, Star Trek, Iron Man and etc weren’t exactly high art either. Good movies, sure. “The Godfather’, not so much. Outside of the fanbase, no one gives much of a pinch about G.I. Joe’s “original source material”. Same goes for the superhero flicks. Most of us just want to be entertained. Hell, even as a guy who grew reading comics and playing with toys, I don’t care how “faithful” it is–in fact, I often hope they dumb down the setup because it’s most often a boring geeky waste of time–so long as it’s entertaining.

  • Skywarppro

    I too am disappointed in not having Scarlet back. Other than that, I have little problems with the rest of the missing cast.

    Now I see rumors today about Sgt. Slaughter having a cameo? Is there again any chance of Larry Hama being in this one?

  • Peclemmons74

    nope

  • TheFallen

    There are some very good points mentioned and the rumours of Sgt Slaughter have me shivering with antici-

    pation

  • ARROW

    Seen it, as shown on the Canadian Martimes feed of ET. Its about 5 minutes in to the show, so do not dread having to watch thru all the other fluff they promote. Not a full trailer, per se, more like clips from the trailer intercut around stuff about the cast. Will not spoil it, but its a GOOD TRAILER.

  • JMM

    I went into that movie willing to accept almost anything, figuring just seeing those characters brought to life at all will be enough. But I wasn’t. I wanted to like it, but I just found it to be a dumb movie with bad CGI and performances. Even the one bright spot for me — the Baroness — was revealed to not even really be a villain. But they could have made all kinds of changes to the source material as far as I was concerned, but only if it was a good movie. And it just didn’t do it for me. I was mostly disappointed because it had the potential to be much more.

    I don’t expect this one to be Shakespeare either, but it at least looks closer to the G.I. Joe I know, and I think with a more charismatic lead in the Rock, it may turn out a lot better.

  • MichaelPru

    I went and rewatched the RoC trailer — my recollection was that it was pretty good and that reaction was positive (although other things had fandom stressed out). I was wrong; that trailer is pretty bad and the CGI is horrible. Especially the accelerator suits.

    Nevertheless I think it’s a mistake to read too much into the Retaliation Trailer: there should be enough good in any movie to put together a kick-ass trailer. It’s when the trailer sucks or showcases repeatedly a sucky scene that the filmmaker clearly thinks is the setpiece that we should freak out.

    What I think does bode well for the new movie is no Sommers. He made one good move: the first Mummy. Everything else sucked. And, more to the point, sucked in the exact same way: inappropriate humor, set-pieces shoehorned into the movie and poor CGI. So Sommers had a track record that would lead you to believe that his take on GIJoe would feature the same (note that with a few exceptions his actors love him which is often confused with a good movie — he may be a great director to work with but that doesn’t mean the stories he tells are good). While John Chu may have made his name in a different genre there is nothing in his body of work that indicates the genre is characteristic of his storytelling style. So that’s hope.

    On that same note, I’d urge everyone to consider that the Rock’s track record is actually pretty poor. While I’ve found him charismatic, the actual movies don’t exactly blow me away — I mean, which of these movies hits a level of quality (genre aside) that would satisfy you: Scorpion King, The Rundown, Be Cool, Walking Tall, Gridiron Gang, The Game Plan, Get Smart, Race to Witch Mountain, Planet 51, Tooth Fairy, Doom, Why Did I Get Married Too?, The Other Guys, Faster or Fast Five?

    Not trying to be as negative as this probably sounds — not saying it’s doomed to suck, just that there’s nothing that makes me think it’s likely to rock either.



  • Reviews (By Year)

  • 2000 2001 2002
    2003 2004 2005
    2006 2007 2008
    2009 2010 2011
  • Sponsored Links

  • Categories

  • Archives